<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jak and Daxter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamerlimit.com/2012/02/jak-and-daxter-collection-now-available/jak_and_daxter_3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamerlimit.com/2012/02/jak-and-daxter-collection-now-available/jak_and_daxter_3/</link>
	<description>Gamer Limit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleveiyah</title>
		<link>http://gamerlimit.com/2012/02/jak-and-daxter-collection-now-available/jak_and_daxter_3/#comment-87776</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleveiyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamerlimit.com/files/2012/02/Jak_and_Daxter_3.jpg#comment-87776</guid>
		<description>serious xbox 360 vs ps3 question?first off, i dont want plepoe saying xbox 360/ps3 rules or stuff like that.on sunday, the xbox 360 20gb will go down to $300, and so im thinking of getting one.im still torn bet. a 360 and a ps3.hardware-wise, 360 is still a better console. yes, the ps3 has a more powerful engine, but that doesn&#039;t mean it has the better graphics, etc. remember the original xbox vs ps2? xbox is superior before, but ps2 games still look awesome. and i know that 360 has a smarter anti-aliasing back buffer techniques, although ps3 has the cell broadband engine.also, i&#039;m considering the game library. 360 has a solid game library. but as you all know, xbox is entering its 3rd year. that means sooner or later, there will be a new xbox. and ps3, although a total bum on its 1st year, is a pretty new console. that means the ps3 will not likely be replaced in the next 2-3 years. ps3 also has strong titles, but for me, games are still few.for the wi-fi, xbox live costs you nearly $50 a year. ps3 is free of charge.and most importantly, the cost. although 360 is the cheaper console, you still need to buy the wi-fi adapter, hdmi cable, usb cables, which in total, will be like the ps3 s cost, since the ps3 comes with built-in wi-fi and accessories i.e. hdmi cables, etc.also, will it be a plus for the ps3 cause i have a psp. or not really?i want plepoe to be fair in their answers, and give me a concrete argument about it. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>serious xbox 360 vs ps3 question?first off, i dont want plepoe saying xbox 360/ps3 rules or stuff like that.on sunday, the xbox 360 20gb will go down to $300, and so im thinking of getting one.im still torn bet. a 360 and a ps3.hardware-wise, 360 is still a better console. yes, the ps3 has a more powerful engine, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it has the better graphics, etc. remember the original xbox vs ps2? xbox is superior before, but ps2 games still look awesome. and i know that 360 has a smarter anti-aliasing back buffer techniques, although ps3 has the cell broadband engine.also, i&#8217;m considering the game library. 360 has a solid game library. but as you all know, xbox is entering its 3rd year. that means sooner or later, there will be a new xbox. and ps3, although a total bum on its 1st year, is a pretty new console. that means the ps3 will not likely be replaced in the next 2-3 years. ps3 also has strong titles, but for me, games are still few.for the wi-fi, xbox live costs you nearly $50 a year. ps3 is free of charge.and most importantly, the cost. although 360 is the cheaper console, you still need to buy the wi-fi adapter, hdmi cable, usb cables, which in total, will be like the ps3 s cost, since the ps3 comes with built-in wi-fi and accessories i.e. hdmi cables, etc.also, will it be a plus for the ps3 cause i have a psp. or not really?i want plepoe to be fair in their answers, and give me a concrete argument about it. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
